According to @deanmlittle on X on Nov 13, 2025, the post states "you can just merge things," tags @anza_xyz, and links to another X post by Claire, but provides no technical or market details. According to the same source, the post does not specify any repository, proposal ID, network, or implementation timeline, offering no verifiable change to protocol parameters. According to the source, no cryptocurrencies or tickers are mentioned and there is no code reference, governance vote, or release note, indicating no actionable trading catalyst at this time. According to the source, traders should wait for official commits, release notes, or governance proposals from the relevant project teams before considering any position changes.

According to the source, the Uniswap Foundation announced a governance proposal to activate Uniswap protocol fees and implement UNI token burns, while restructuring the ecosystem under a unified development model led by Uniswap Labs, source: Uniswap Foundation governance announcement. For traders, protocol fees establish on-chain revenue and token burns reduce circulating UNI, making governance voting and rollout milestones key catalysts to monitor for UNI price, liquidity, and funding dynamics, source: Uniswap Foundation governance announcement.

According to @dydxfoundation, a new dYdX Forum proposal (DRC) is exploring changes to protocol revenue distribution across DYDX buybacks, staking rewards, the MegaVault, and the Treasury (source: dYdX Foundation on X, Oct 31, 2025; dYdX Forum DRC: Revenue share on dYdX). The DRC suggests increasing the share allocated to DYDX buybacks to potentially as high as 75% of protocol revenue (source: dYdX Foundation on X, Oct 31, 2025; dYdX Forum DRC: Revenue share on dYdX). The proposal also recommends reducing or phasing out the MegaVault share while adjusting allocations to staking and the Treasury (source: dYdX Foundation on X, Oct 31, 2025; dYdX Forum DRC: Revenue share on dYdX). The item is under discussion on the forum, and traders should monitor the governance thread for final percentages and any implementation details that determine how revenue flows to buybacks versus staking (source: dYdX Foundation on X, Oct 31, 2025; dYdX Forum DRC: Revenue share on dYdX).

According to @jp_mullin888, the community discussion forum for the $OM to $MANTRA upgrade will close in 12 hours. Source: @jp_mullin888 on X, Oct 30, 2025. After the forum closes, the process will proceed to an official governance proposal, marking the next actionable milestone for participants. Source: @jp_mullin888 on X, Oct 30, 2025. Community members are invited to share thoughts and feedback before the discussion window ends. Source: @jp_mullin888 on X, Oct 30, 2025. For traders, the imminent transition to an official governance proposal is the key near-term catalyst to watch following the forum closure. Source: @jp_mullin888 on X, Oct 30, 2025.

According to @dydxfoundation, a live governance forum proposal would allocate 100% of net protocol fees to DYDX token buybacks for a three-month experimental trial from Nov 1, 2025 to Jan 31, 2026, with discussion hosted on the dYdX forum, source: dYdX Foundation on X, Oct 29, 2025; dYdX forum. For traders, if approved, this redirects all net fees into continuous DYDX buybacks during the stated window, creating mechanical buy-side flow equal to net fees while the policy is active, with the initiative currently at the proposal stage pending community decision, source: dYdX forum; dYdX Foundation on X, Oct 29, 2025.

According to @dydxfoundation, the dYdX community is reviewing a Trading Leagues pilot focused on non-API traders, source: dYdX Foundation on X. The program would allocate up to USD 1 million in DYDX over four weeks, source: dYdX Foundation on X. The stated goal is to test how short-term trading competitions influence user engagement and liquidity depth on dYdX, source: dYdX Foundation on X. Community discussion is active on the dYdX forum at dydx.forum/t/dydx-trading-leagues-pilot-program-request-1m-in-dydx-from-the-community-treasury/4613, source: dYdX Foundation on X.

According to @jp_mullin888, the planned token upgrade will involve no dilution to existing holders, source: @jp_mullin888 on X, Oct 8, 2025. The upgrade will be executed at the chain level so holders will not need to migrate or take any action, source: @jp_mullin888 on X, Oct 8, 2025. The rollout will occur only after community discussions, a governance proposal is ratified, exchanges accept the change, and the ERC20 token is fully deprecated in January next year, source: @jp_mullin888 on X, Oct 8, 2025. For traders, this sets a clear sequence of prerequisites and a timeline that extends until after January next year before any upgrade goes live, source: @jp_mullin888 on X, Oct 8, 2025.

According to @EmberCN, WLFI burned 47 million $WLFI from an unlocked treasury wallet about six hours ago, valued at approximately $11.34 million, with an on-chain burn link shared in the post (source: @EmberCN). The stated rationale was to commemorate a buyback-and-burn governance proposal as referenced in the same post (source: @EmberCN). In addition, after trading went live two nights earlier, the team conducted an on-chain buyback of 6.498 million $WLFI at $0.308 using 2 million USD1, with a transaction link provided (source: @EmberCN). For traders, these actions represent reported token removal and buy-side activity aligned with a governance process as described in the cited post (source: @EmberCN).

According to @ai_9684xtpa, Aave founder Stani Kulechov confirmed a referenced governance proposal remains valid by replying Yep to a direct question, source: @ai_9684xtpa tweet ID 1959274377381376427 dated Aug 23, 2025. The post does not identify which specific proposal is in question, so traders cannot derive parameter changes or timelines from this item alone and should verify details on the Aave governance forum before positioning, source: @ai_9684xtpa tweet ID 1959274377381376427 and Aave DAO governance documentation. Aave governance controls risk parameters such as collateral factors, interest rate curves, asset listings and their risk settings that can influence AAVE token utility, liquidity and protocol borrowing costs, so traders should monitor AAVE spot, perp funding and open interest alongside official governance updates, source: Aave protocol documentation and Aave DAO governance documentation.

According to @ai_9684xtpa, a WLFI proposal indicates Aave would receive 7% of WLFI’s total token supply as a lending-ecosystem partner, with that allocation currently valued at $2.79B (source: @ai_9684xtpa). According to @ai_9684xtpa, this relative value versus AAVE’s current fully diluted valuation of $5.9B is a key driver behind AAVE appearing among top gainers (source: @ai_9684xtpa). According to @ai_9684xtpa, the proposal surfaced late last year and a proposal link was shared, raising timing questions about why the market is reacting now (source: @ai_9684xtpa).

According to @ranyi1115, OIP-1 is open for community input to balance ORDER staking rewards with token buybacks, with discussion hosted on orderly.discourse.group; Source: @ranyi1115 on X; Source: orderly.discourse.group. Current ORDER staking yield is reported at 37.3%, providing the immediate yield context for participants; Source: @ranyi1115 on X. The post explicitly calls on stakers to engage in the OIP-1 discussion, highlighting a near-term governance focal point for traders tracking reward and buyback parameters; Source: @ranyi1115 on X.

According to @ItsDave_ADA, a Cardano governance proposal requesting 1.3 million ADA aims to enable a platform to view all transactions and DEX swaps before execution, effectively granting the ability to front-run users. Despite these concerns, the proposal has received over 70% approval from DReps and is on track for funding. Traders should closely monitor Cardano (ADA) governance developments, as increased centralization and potential front-running risks could significantly impact ADA's on-chain trading environment and price dynamics (source: @ItsDave_ADA).

According to Michaël van de Poppe, $VET is poised for significant growth with the Renaissance project going live in July 2025 and the acquisition of a MiCAR license, enabling service provision to European enterprises. This development is expected to enhance VET's market position and potentially impact trading volumes positively. Moreover, governance proposal updates and improved tokenomics along with staking rewards throughout Q2 could attract more traders and investors to the VET network.

According to dYdX Foundation, a governance proposal is underway to upgrade selected markets from isolated to cross margin. This change could impact open positions in these markets and potentially increase the risk of liquidation. Traders are advised to proceed with caution and consider the implications for their positions.

According to @dydxfoundation, the recent governance proposal saw participation from 44 out of 60 Active Set validators and 790 accounts, resulting in a turnout of 55.41%. The proposal received overwhelming support with 97.15% voting 'Yes', 0.00% voting 'No', and 2.85% abstaining. This significant approval indicates strong community backing and could positively influence dYdX's market dynamics.

According to dYdX Foundation, any future distributions of incentives under the program will require approval through a dYdX governance proposal. This indicates that community governance will play a crucial role in determining the allocation of future incentives, potentially impacting the dYdX ecosystem and its users.